Peace Dialogue, Beyond Business

Following the 5G Citizens Conferences, Entreps Bio reinforces its commitment to Peace Dialogue aligned with UN SDG 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions.
Peace Talks and true multilateralism must strengthen trust, stability, and cooperation over fragmented interests, rejecting the cannibalization of commercial agendas.

Entreps Bio places life, dignity, and respect above any extractive or predatory logic.
Peace Dialogue is the path to lasting peace and stronger institutions.

Peace is not only a diplomatic objective. It is also a business responsibility.

In a world marked by conflict, polarisation, institutional mistrust, social fragmentation and aggressive competition, sustainable business cannot be understood only as environmental responsibility or economic efficiency. A business is sustainable when it contributes to conditions in which people, communities, institutions and markets can coexist with dignity, fairness and trust.

The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal 16 calls for peaceful and inclusive societies, access to justice, and effective, accountable and inclusive institutions. This is not separate from business. It is one of the foundations on which responsible economies are built. Without peace, trust weakens. Without trust, cooperation becomes fragile. Without cooperation, sustainable business cannot flourish.  

For the International Board for Sustainable Business, Ethical AI & Peace Dialogue, peace dialogue must therefore be understood as an essential part of wise business: a way of doing business that does not glorify conflict, domination or predatory competition, but instead values responsibility, experience, respect and constructive collaboration.


BEYOND COMPETITION: THE NEED FOR BUSINESS WISDOM

Markets are often described through the language of battle: rivals, conquest, disruption, domination, winners and losers. Competition can stimulate improvement, discipline and innovation. But when competition becomes a philosophy of permanent hostility, it can damage the very social fabric that allows markets to function.

Sustainable business requires a different kind of intelligence. It requires knowing when to compete and when to cooperate. It requires recognising that a rival is not necessarily an enemy. It requires understanding that long-term prosperity depends not only on individual success, but also on stable institutions, fair rules, trustworthy relationships and healthy ecosystems.

This is where peace dialogue enters the business world.

Peace dialogue does not mean eliminating disagreement. It means creating the conditions to manage disagreement without destruction. It means replacing the logic of humiliation with the logic of respect. It means understanding that conflict, when handled wisely, can become negotiation, learning and progress.

In business, this approach is urgently needed. The alternative is a culture of wild markets, where short-term gain justifies almost everything: exploitation, misinformation, unfair practices, social division, environmental harm and the erosion of trust. Such a model may produce temporary winners, but it does not produce sustainable prosperity.

Wise business understands that the quality of relationships matters.


SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS AS A CULTURE OF RESTRAINT

One of the most overlooked virtues in business is restraint.

Restraint does not mean weakness. It means knowing that not every opportunity should be exploited, not every advantage should be abused, and not every rival should be destroyed. It means understanding that economic power must be exercised with responsibility.

The UN Global Compact states that corporate sustainability begins with a company’s value system and a principles-based approach to doing business. It defines fundamental responsibilities in the areas of human rights, labour, environment and anti-corruption, and stresses that good practices in one area do not offset harm in another.  

This principle is essential for wise business. A company cannot claim to be sustainable if its success depends on damaging workers, communities, institutions or the environment. Nor can it claim to contribute to peace if its culture is based on hostility, abuse or irresponsible pressure.

Sustainable business is not simply the pursuit of growth with a green label attached. It is the disciplined practice of responsibility. It is the capacity to create value without destroying the human and ecological conditions that make value creation possible.

Peace dialogue gives this responsibility a social and relational dimension. It reminds businesses that how they treat competitors, partners, employees, suppliers, institutions and communities is part of their real impact.


RESPECT FOR RIVALS AS A MARK OF MATURE BUSINESS

Respecting rivals does not mean avoiding competition. It means recognising that competition must remain within ethical limits.

A mature business culture understands that rivals can push each other to improve. They can raise standards. They can inspire innovation. They can even collaborate on shared challenges such as sustainability, fair supply chains, skills development, safety, climate adaptation or responsible governance.

This is not idealism. It is practical wisdom.

No business operates in isolation. Every company depends on a wider ecosystem: suppliers, logistics, infrastructure, public institutions, financial systems, employees, customers, professional standards and social trust. When companies act as if the destruction of the other is the only path to success, they weaken that ecosystem.

Wise business chooses another path. It accepts competition, but rejects dehumanisation. It pursues excellence, but rejects predation. It seeks success, but not at the expense of dignity, fairness or peace.

This is particularly relevant in a global context where economic rivalry can easily become social or political hostility. Business leaders have a responsibility to model another language: one of firmness without aggression, ambition without abuse, and competition without contempt.


APPRENTICESHIP AND THE PRESERVATION OF BUSINESS LEGACY

Peace dialogue is not only a matter of international relations. It is also a matter of transmission between generations.

Every society contains business knowledge that cannot be fully captured in manuals, reports or algorithms. It lives in experience: in those who have built companies, faced crises, negotiated with rivals, protected employees, recovered from failure, resisted shortcuts and learned that reputation takes years to build and moments to lose.

This is why apprenticeship is essential.

Apprenticeship should not be understood only as technical training. In the context of wise business, it is the transmission of judgement. It is the preservation of ethical memory. It is how experienced businesspeople pass on not only what works, but what should never be done.

The legacy of senior business leaders, founders, family businesses, experienced managers and professionals with long trajectories can become a strategic resource for sustainable business. Their knowledge can help younger or less experienced professionals understand that business is not only about tactics, speed or aggressive growth. It is also about patience, trust, negotiation, resilience and respect.

A society that does not preserve its business wisdom risks repeating avoidable mistakes. It may become fascinated by disruption while forgetting responsibility. It may celebrate speed while losing judgement. It may reward expansion while ignoring the human cost.

Peace dialogue in business therefore includes intergenerational dialogue. It values those who have learned through time, crisis and responsibility. It recognises that sustainable business is not built only by innovation, but also by memory.


COLLABORATION AGAINST THE LOGIC OF WILD MARKETS

The idea of “wild markets” suggests an economic environment where anything is acceptable if it produces advantage. In such a culture, collaboration is seen as weakness, ethics as decoration, and peace as irrelevant to business.

But sustainable business depends on the opposite logic.

The UN Global Compact defines its ambition as accelerating and scaling the collective impact of business by upholding principles and delivering the Sustainable Development Goals through accountable companies and ecosystems that enable change.   This language is important: sustainable transformation requires ecosystems, not isolated winners.

Responsible business conduct also requires companies to identify, prevent, mitigate and account for negative impacts in their operations, supply chains and business relationships. The OECD describes due diligence as a process that helps companies assess and address actual and potential negative impacts across those relationships.  

This means that business responsibility extends beyond the company’s walls. It reaches suppliers, partners, customers, communities and even competitors when shared standards are at stake.

Collaboration is not the opposite of competitiveness. In mature economies, collaboration can raise the quality of competition. It can create common rules, improve transparency, reduce abuse, support innovation and protect the public interest.

Wise business understands that there are areas where companies should not compete downward: human dignity, worker safety, corruption, environmental harm, misinformation or exploitation. In these areas, collaboration is not optional. It is a responsibility.


PEACE AS A BUSINESS ENVIRONMENT

Peace is often treated as something external to business: a condition created by governments, diplomats or international organisations. But business decisions can either strengthen or weaken peaceful conditions.

When companies respect rights, promote decent work, avoid corruption, reduce environmental harm, engage communities and act transparently, they contribute to trust. When they exploit fragility, ignore harms, fuel inequality or operate without accountability, they can contribute to instability.

This is especially important in fragile or conflict-affected contexts. The OECD guidance on responsible supply chains in conflict-affected and high-risk areas recognises the private sector as a critical force that can influence the well-being of societies, and as bearing particular responsibility when operating in or sourcing from such areas.  

Peace dialogue, therefore, is not only about ending wars. It is about preventing the economic behaviours that make societies more fragile. It is about building business cultures that prefer fairness to abuse, negotiation to domination, and long-term trust to short-term extraction.

A peaceful business environment does not emerge automatically. It is built through institutions, ethical leadership, responsible markets and habits of dialogue.


FROM AGGRESSIVE GROWTH TO RESPONSIBLE CONTINUITY

Modern business culture often glorifies speed: scale fast, dominate quickly, disrupt everything. But sustainable business also needs continuity.

Continuity does not mean stagnation. It means building companies, institutions and relationships that can endure. It means respecting the time required to develop trust, train people, protect reputation and create responsible value.

Older and experienced businesspeople often understand this deeply. They know that not every profitable decision is wise. They know that an agreement imposed through force may create resentment. They know that rivals today may become partners tomorrow. They know that communities remember how they were treated. They know that a company without trust is always vulnerable.

This is the legacy that apprenticeship must preserve.

The future of sustainable business will not be built only by new technologies, new brands or new financial models. It will also be built by recovering forms of business wisdom that have always mattered: prudence, fairness, loyalty, respect, patience, dialogue and responsibility.

In that sense, peace dialogue is not a soft concept. It is a discipline of continuity.


WISE BUSINESS AND GOOD GOVERNANCE

Peaceful and sustainable markets require good governance. They require institutions that are accountable, transparent and inclusive. They require rules that prevent abuse and mechanisms that allow disputes to be resolved without violence, corruption or coercion.

SDG 16 explicitly connects peace with justice and strong institutions. It recognises that peaceful societies depend on access to justice, effective institutions and accountability.   Eurostat’s SDG 16 framework similarly links peaceful and inclusive societies with human rights, rule of law, good governance and protection of the most vulnerable.  

For business, this means that sustainability cannot be separated from governance. A company may have environmental initiatives, but if it tolerates corruption or abuses power, it weakens the foundations of peace. A company may speak of social impact, but if it treats relationships as purely extractive, it undermines trust.

Wise business requires governance at two levels: internal and external.

Internally, companies need values, accountability, ethical leadership and decision-making processes that prevent irresponsible behaviour.

Externally, companies must support fair rules, responsible partnerships and constructive dialogue with institutions, competitors and communities.

This is where the International Board for Sustainable Business, Ethical AI & Peace Dialogue can occupy a distinct and necessary space: promoting a business culture where sustainability is not only measured by environmental indicators, but also by the quality of relationships, the maturity of leadership and the contribution to peaceful coexistence.


PEACE DIALOGUE, WISE BUSINESS

The title is not only a phrase. It is a position.

Peace dialogue means recognising that business exists inside society, not above it.

Wise business means understanding that success without responsibility is fragile.

Together, they form a necessary response to a world where economic pressure, geopolitical tension and social mistrust can easily push markets toward aggression.

The business world does not need less ambition. It needs wiser ambition.

Ambition that builds rather than destroys.
Competition that respects rather than dehumanises.
Growth that protects rather than exploits.
Leadership that teaches rather than dominates.
Experience that is transmitted rather than forgotten.
Dialogue that prevents conflict rather than merely reacting to it.

This is the business culture needed for sustainable prosperity.


CONCLUSION: PEACE AS THE HIGHEST FORM OF BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

Peace is not passive. It is not weakness. It is not the absence of ambition.

Peace is the highest form of business intelligence because it understands interdependence. It recognises that no company can prosper for long in a broken society, a degraded environment, a corrupt market or a culture of permanent hostility.

Wise business protects the conditions that make business possible.

It respects rivals because it understands that competition without dignity becomes destruction.

It values apprenticeship because it understands that experience is a form of social capital.

It preserves the legacy of those who built responsibly because it knows that the future needs memory, not only innovation.

It rejects wild markets because it understands that markets without ethics eventually consume the trust on which they depend.

And it embraces constructive collaboration because it knows that the most urgent challenges of our time cannot be solved by isolated actors.

For the International Board for Sustainable Business, Ethical AI & Peace Dialogue, peace dialogue is not an accessory to sustainable business. It is one of its deepest foundations.

Today, I have looked into the eyes of every elder I have met, and each one has silently shared with me their lived experience of inner peace only reached after witnessing many absurd wars.

Peace is not an idea, but what remains after conflict has taught its deepest lessons.

What does a dictator, a tyrant, inspire in you?

Entreps Looking Beyond the Horizon.

Ethical AI, Wise Business

Following the 5G Citizens conferences of the Global Entreps Awards II to V, Entreps is making now a firm commitment to the Age of Artificial Intelligence. What is it? How can we live alongside it? Can it be ethical and responsible?

Artificial Intelligence is changing the way businesses make decisions, organise knowledge, communicate, evaluate risks and imagine the future. Its potential is considerable. AI can help organisations analyse complex information, improve efficiency, support sustainability strategies, detect operational risks, expand access to knowledge and strengthen decision-making.

But potential is not the same as wisdom.

A tool may be powerful and still be poorly governed. A system may be efficient and still be unfair. A model may produce fast answers and still weaken judgement. A technology may accelerate business processes and still damage trust if it is opaque, discriminatory, irresponsible or detached from human dignity.

For Entreps, the International Board for Sustainable Business, Ethical AI & Peace Dialogue, the central question is not whether businesses should use Artificial Intelligence. The real question is how AI can be used in ways that strengthen sustainable business, protect human dignity, preserve responsible judgement and support long-term trust.

Ethical AI is not simply about compliance. It is about wise business.


FROM INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS TO RESPONSIBLE DECISIONS

Artificial Intelligence is often discussed as if intelligence were mainly a technical matter: prediction, automation, optimisation, scale and speed. These capabilities are important, but they do not define whether AI is ethically acceptable or socially useful.

A system can be technically advanced while producing irresponsible outcomes. It can classify, recommend, generate, rank or predict, but it cannot assume moral responsibility. Responsibility remains with people, institutions and businesses.

This distinction is essential.

UNESCO’s Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence places human rights and human dignity at the centre of AI governance. It stresses principles such as transparency, fairness and human oversight, and warns that AI systems can create or intensify harms if they are not properly governed.  

This means that AI should not be adopted only because it is available, fashionable or commercially attractive. It should be adopted only when its purpose, risks, limits and responsibilities are understood.

A wise business must ask:

  • What decision is this AI system influencing?
  • Who may benefit from it?
  • Who may be harmed, excluded or misrepresented?
  • Can the outcome be explained?
  • Can a person challenge the decision?
  • Is there meaningful human oversight?
  • Does the system respect privacy, dignity and non-discrimination?
  • Does it support sustainable business, or merely accelerate short-term advantage?

These questions are not obstacles to innovation. They are the conditions that allow innovation to be trusted.


ETHICAL AI AS A BUSINESS RESPONSIBILITY

The OECD AI Principles promote trustworthy AI that respects human rights and democratic values. First adopted in 2019 and updated in 2024, they provide values-based principles and practical recommendations for policymakers and AI actors.  

The updated OECD framework is particularly important because it connects AI with human-centred values, non-discrimination, equality, privacy, data protection, fairness, social justice, labour rights and the need to address misinformation and disinformation amplified by AI.  

This confirms that ethical AI is not a narrow technical topic. It belongs inside the broader responsibility of business.

A company that uses AI to recruit, evaluate, communicate, price, monitor, predict or advise is making decisions that can affect people’s opportunities, rights, trust and dignity. Therefore, AI governance must be integrated into corporate governance, sustainability strategy, risk management and responsible business conduct.

Ethical AI should not be treated as a separate department or a decorative statement. It should become part of how a business understands responsibility.

A company cannot claim to be sustainable if it uses opaque systems that discriminate against workers or customers. It cannot claim to act responsibly if automated decisions cannot be explained or challenged. It cannot claim to support human dignity if technology is used to intensify surveillance, manipulation or exclusion.

Wise business recognises that technological power requires ethical discipline.


THE DANGER OF SPEED WITHOUT JUDGEMENT

One of the strongest temptations in the current AI landscape is speed. Businesses are encouraged to automate faster, produce faster, decide faster and compete faster. Speed can be valuable, especially when it reduces waste, improves safety or helps organisations respond to complexity.

But speed without judgement is dangerous.

Business history shows that not every efficient process is responsible. Not every profitable decision is wise. Not every innovation strengthens society. Some decisions should be slowed down, questioned, reviewed and discussed because they affect human lives, reputations, rights or long-term trust.

This is where ethical AI must recover a very old business principle: prudence.

Prudence does not mean fear of innovation. It means the ability to distinguish between what can be done and what should be done. It means understanding consequences before scaling decisions. It means knowing that the cost of a mistake may not be only financial, but human, social and institutional.

AI can support decision-making, but it should not replace responsible judgement. In sensitive contexts –employment, finance, education, healthcare, essential services, public information or conflict-affected environments– human oversight is not optional. It is a condition of legitimacy.

The European Union’s AI Act reflects this movement from broad ethical discussion toward concrete governance obligations. The Act entered into force on 1 August 2024 and establishes a legal framework to address risks from AI, with progressive implementation for prohibited practices, general-purpose AI models and high-risk systems.  

The regulatory direction is clear: businesses will increasingly be expected not only to use AI, but to govern it.


SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS REQUIRES ETHICAL TECHNOLOGY

Sustainable business is not limited to environmental responsibility. It also includes human rights, labour standards, transparency, anti-corruption, good governance, trust and long-term resilience.

AI affects all these dimensions.

It can support sustainable business by improving energy management, analysing supply-chain risks, identifying inefficiencies, supporting accessibility, strengthening reporting, helping detect fraud or assisting with climate-related data. However, AI can also undermine sustainability if it increases inequality, consumes excessive resources, weakens privacy, automates unfair decisions or amplifies misinformation.

The UN Global Compact has encouraged companies to align AI use with the Sustainable Development Goals and to embed ethical considerations throughout AI lifecycle management. It also stresses the need for AI governance frameworks rooted in transparency, accountability and human-centric design.  

This is a crucial point: AI used for sustainability must itself be governed sustainably.

A company cannot justify irresponsible AI simply because the business objective sounds positive. A system designed to support environmental reporting may still be problematic if the data is unreliable. A tool designed to optimise work may still be harmful if it intensifies pressure on employees without transparency. A model used to improve customer experience may still be unethical if it manipulates behaviour or invades privacy.

Ethical AI requires coherence between purpose, method and impact.


APPRENTICESHIP IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

Artificial Intelligence creates a new challenge for business culture: how to preserve judgement when decision-making becomes increasingly automated.

Many forms of business wisdom are not written in technical manuals. They are transmitted through experience: how to negotiate without destroying trust, how to identify a dishonest shortcut, how to treat a rival with respect, how to protect reputation, how to manage uncertainty, how to admit error, and how to balance ambition with responsibility.

This is why apprenticeship matters.

In the age of AI, apprenticeship should not be understood only as training people to use digital tools. It should be understood as the transmission of ethical judgement from experienced professionals to those with less experience.

Senior business leaders, founders, managers, specialists and professionals with long trajectories carry knowledge that cannot be replaced by automation. Their value is not only technical expertise. It is memory. It is judgement. It is the ability to recognise patterns of responsibility and risk that are not always visible in data.

AI can process information, but it cannot inherit a business legacy. It cannot understand the moral weight of a decision in the same way as a person who has lived through crisis, failure, recovery and responsibility.

A wise business does not replace experience with automation. It uses technology to support experience.


PRESERVING LEGACY WHILE EMBRACING INNOVATION

There is sometimes a false opposition between tradition and innovation. In reality, sustainable business needs both.

Innovation without memory can become reckless. Legacy without adaptation can become rigid. The challenge is to connect them.

Artificial Intelligence should not erase the accumulated wisdom of experienced businesspeople. It should help preserve, organise and transmit it. Used responsibly, AI can support knowledge management, document institutional memory, identify lessons learned, assist training, and make complex information more accessible across organisations.

But this must be done with care. The preservation of business legacy is not only the storage of information. It is the preservation of context, values and judgement.

A responsible organisation should ask not only how AI can make operations faster, but how it can help transmit what deserves to endure: respect for clients, fairness with suppliers, constructive relations with rivals, commitment to workers, prudence in risk, and responsibility toward society.

This is where ethical AI becomes part of wise business. It allows innovation to serve continuity rather than destroy it.


HUMAN OVERSIGHT AS A CONDITION OF TRUST

The concept of human oversight is often mentioned in AI ethics, but it must be understood properly. Human oversight does not mean that a person simply approves whatever a system produces. It means that humans remain meaningfully capable of understanding, questioning, correcting, interrupting and taking responsibility for AI-supported decisions.

Oversight must be real, not symbolic.

If employees do not understand the system, oversight is weak. If managers cannot challenge the output, oversight is weak. If affected people cannot appeal decisions, oversight is weak. If responsibility is hidden behind “the algorithm,” oversight has failed.

UNESCO’s Recommendation emphasises oversight, impact assessment, audit and due diligence mechanisms to ensure accountability across the AI lifecycle.  

For business, this requires practical governance. Companies should know where AI is being used, what data it relies on, who supervises it, what risks it creates, and how errors or harms are addressed.

Human oversight is not anti-technology. It is the mechanism that allows technology to remain accountable to human values.


AI, MISINFORMATION AND THE PROTECTION OF TRUST

Trust is one of the most important assets in business and society. Without trust, contracts become fragile, institutions lose legitimacy, customers hesitate, employees disengage and cooperation becomes difficult.

AI can strengthen trust when it is transparent, reliable and responsibly governed. But it can also weaken trust when it is used to generate misinformation, manipulate perception, imitate human identity, produce false evidence or flood public debate with unreliable content.

This concern is not theoretical. The OECD’s 2024 update explicitly recognises the need to address misinformation and disinformation amplified by AI while respecting freedom of expression and other protected rights.  

For sustainable business, this is critical. Companies must not use AI to deceive, exaggerate, impersonate, manipulate or create false impressions of credibility. Responsible communication becomes even more important in an environment where synthetic content can look authentic.

Wise business protects trust even when technology makes manipulation easier.


ACCOUNTABILITY ACROSS THE AI LIFECYCLE

Ethical AI requires responsibility before, during and after deployment.

Before deployment, businesses should define the purpose of the system, assess risks, examine data quality, consider affected stakeholders and decide whether AI is appropriate at all.

During deployment, they should monitor performance, detect bias, ensure human oversight, protect privacy and document decisions.

After deployment, they should review impacts, correct errors, respond to harms and improve governance.

This lifecycle approach is important because AI systems can change over time. Data shifts. Contexts change. Users adapt. Risks emerge. A system that appeared acceptable at the beginning may become harmful if it is not monitored.

The UN Global Compact’s position that ethical considerations should be embedded throughout AI lifecycle management is therefore highly relevant for businesses.  

Ethical AI is not a one-time approval. It is a continuous discipline.


WISE AI FOR WISE BUSINESS

Artificial Intelligence should not be measured only by what it can automate. It should be judged by the quality of the decisions it helps produce.

  • Does it help businesses act more responsibly?
  • Does it improve transparency?
  • Does it reduce harm?
  • Does it support sustainable development?
  • Does it protect dignity?
  • Does it preserve human judgement?
  • Does it strengthen trust?

If the answer is no, then the system may be intelligent in a technical sense, but not wise in a business sense.

The International Board for Sustainable Business, Ethical AI & Peace Dialogue can help advance a necessary idea: the future of business should not be built on artificial intelligence alone, but on responsible intelligence –the combination of technology, ethics, experience, governance and human judgement.

This approach avoids two mistakes.

The first is technological rejection: refusing innovation out of fear.
The second is technological surrender: accepting every innovation without ethical scrutiny.

Wise business chooses a third path: responsible adoption.


WHAT IS NEXT? THE FUTURE NEEDS RESPONSIBLE INTELLIGENCE

Artificial Intelligence will continue to transform business. The question is whether it will make business wiser.

Used responsibly, AI can help organisations understand complexity, reduce waste, support sustainability, preserve knowledge, improve decisions and expand access to information. Used irresponsibly, it can accelerate unfairness, opacity, manipulation, environmental cost and loss of human judgement.

The difference will not be decided by technology alone. It will be decided by governance, values and leadership.

Ethical AI is not a barrier to progress. It is the condition that allows progress to deserve trust.

Wise business does not ask only what AI can do. It asks what AI should do, who it should serve, what limits it must respect, and how responsibility will remain human.

In this sense, ethical AI is not merely a digital agenda. It is part of a wider culture of sustainable business: one that values dignity over domination, judgement over speed, transparency over opacity, and long-term trust over short-term advantage.

The future belongs not to businesses that automate the fastest, but to those that learn how to use intelligence –artificial and human– wisely.

To determine whether you are human or a bot, simply smell the first three flowers you encounter today and tell us whether they all smell the same or not… Entreps — Looking Beyond the Horizon.

Entreps Articke for SDGZero

The World’s Only Sustainable Business Directory Set to Empower SMEs

London, UK – 14 February 2026

This week marks the official launch of SDG:Zero, an initiative designed to recognise and promote the sustainability efforts of small and medium-sized enterprises worldwide. 

At its heart is the Sustainable Business Directory, a platform optimised for local SEO and designed to give start-ups, micro-businesses and SMEs the visibility they deserve for the work they are doing in relation to the UN Sustainable Development Goals

It offers businesses a simple way to showcase their many and diverse commitments, with the aim of attracting customers and partners who value responsible business practices, while also connecting them with a growing community of like-minded organisations. 

“SMEs are the backbone of every community, and they have an important role to play in supporting the SDGs,” said founder Neville Gaunt. “But sustainability can often feel overwhelming or out of reach. SDG:Zero is designed to make that journey more accessible.

“We are building an accessible platform that helps businesses communicate what they are already doing, and this directory is the first step. For many forward-thinking businesses, it offers a practical and valuable opportunity to increase visibility and demonstrate commitment.” 

The SDG:Zero Directory offers four tiers of access:

  • Starter Free Tier: A simple listing for any SME or any person committed to the SDGs.
  • Featured £50 Tier: Enhanced visibility for the price of a coffee a month.
  • Premium £100 Tier: Premium storytelling tools and priority placement.
  • Elite £300 Tier: Leadership recognition and co-creation opportunities.

SDG:Zero also recognises how difficult it can be to start and run a business in a challenging and changing commercial climate. For that reason, it includes the SDG:Zero Resources Vault, focused on helping start-ups, business owners and employees adapt and grow in a new world shaped by AI and changing customer buying behaviours. 

If you have not yet started a business, the Starter Free listing will also provide access to the Resources Vault, which includes practical guides aimed at helping people improve their prospects, including useful resources for students seeking employment. 

Early adopters can also secure Founding Member status, which includes priority placement, locked-in pricing, and an exclusive badge to use as part of their company branding. 

SDG:Zero aims to partner with local authorities, community influencers, SME networks, universities, charities, sustainability consultants and membership organisations to help ensure the directory is accessible to every business. 

All partners will enjoy co-branding opportunities, recognition across all channels, and priority access to future tools. 

More Than a Directory

The mission of SDG:Zero is to help SMEs take practical steps towards sustainability by making their efforts more visible, easier to communicate and better connected to a wider business community. 

“Most SMEs are already doing more for sustainability than they realise — they just need a place to tell their story,” added Neville Gaunt. “Wherever they are in the world, SDG:Zero gives them that platform.” 

The SDG:Zero Sustainable Business Directory is now open for SME listings worldwide. 

Businesses can join at: https://sdgzero.com/join/

Media Contact

SDG:Zero Communications Team

Email: hello@sdgzero.net

Website: www.SDGZero.com


Note on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals

The 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are a UN-adopted framework aimed at ending poverty, protecting the planet, and supporting prosperity. They are intended to be achieved by 2030 through global, national and local action on a range of social, economic and environmental issues, many of which are relevant to the small business community. The full list is as follows: 

Goal 1: No Poverty – End poverty in all its forms everywhere.

Goal 2: Zero Hunger – End hunger, achieve food security, improve nutrition, and promote sustainable agriculture.

Goal 3: Good Health and Well-being – Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all.

Goal 4: Quality Education – Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education.

Goal 5: Gender Equality – Achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls.

Goal 6: Clean Water and Sanitation – Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation.

Goal 7: Affordable and Clean Energy – Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy.

Goal 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth – Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth and productive employment.

Goal 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure – Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive industrialisation, and foster innovation.

Goal 10: Reduced Inequality – Reduce inequality within and among countries.

Goal 11: Sustainable Cities and Communities – Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable.

Goal 12: Responsible Consumption and Production – Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns.

Goal 13: Climate Action – Take action to combat climate change and its impacts.

Goal 14: Life Below Water – Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources.

Goal 15: Life on Land – Protect, restore, and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt biodiversity loss.

Goal 16: Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions – Promote peaceful and inclusive societies, provide access to justice, and build effective, accountable institutions.

Goal 17: Partnerships for the Goals – Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalise the global partnership for sustainable development.

50 Refugee Women Made Soap, Now They’re Building Businesses!

Neville Gaunt, Chairman of Your PassPort2Grow (YP2G) and CEO MindFit has been actively working on a solution to the growing refugee problem. In fact it’s no longer just a problem, it’s a crisis. 

Many refugee camps across Africa are busting at the seems with nearly 4 times the planned number of refugees housed in tents. A refugee camp is supposed to be a safe, temporary haven from war and conflict. But when you’ve spent THIRTEEN years living in one, it becomes your home.

But unlike the homes we know, these are more akin to prisons. There’s virtually nothing you can do to improve the conditions – and you can’t break free.

This is the reality of life today for millions of refugees and it’s getting worse as escalating military and political disasters drive more and more from the only real homes they have known and putting their lives on hold.

It’s a refugee crisis not just a problem and the Aid Agency (NGO) model is broken

We rely on Aid Agencies to follow the old saying 

“give a man a fish, he feeds for a day, teach him how to fish he feeds his family for life”

But these agencies are struggling to do the feeding and not touching the teaching. 

There are only two ways refugees can improve conditions for themselves and their families:

1 start a business

2 get a job

Sadly, the infrastructure in most camps doesn’t support either. The few projects aimed at creating entrepreneurs are soon dashed by a lack of leadership and resources. Only a lucky few, those with qualifications, will find a job and move out. But they’re all too rare.

We know we can’t change this overnight, but you can help by joining our group of international business mentors and local in-camp leaders and trainers who all work to a simple model, based on nothing more than commitment and common sense.

Be in no doubt, this an ambitious international collaboration and one that will soon see us bring together a few pockets of early success and make each of them sustainable under the same model.

The results

We trained 50 refugee women to make and sell soap, restoring their confidence, giving them hope  and building a brighter future. (This is the third time we’ve run the programme, so it’s a process that works and not just luck!)

And we do all this for $50 per startup!

  • Trainers – refugees in the camp – $20
  • Training Equipment – $15
  • Startup supplies – $10 
  • Support post startup -$5

All the coaching/training/mentoring by the international team is given free.

Once trading profitably the startup micro business – pays a monthly club fee as payback – $2 

We now need your help to reach more refugees!

Donate and empower refugees to become entrepreneurs https://www.gofundme.com/f/how-you-can-help-the-refugee-crisis

Our United Nations… by Thakur S. Powdyel

Thakur S. Powdyel

Our United Nations: 75 Years on…

One war too many; one misery, all miseries; one dream, all dreams… This was the context, extent, and intent that led to the founding of the United Nations Organisation from the ashes of the Second World War that engulfed humanity on a scale unprecedented and desolation unimaginable. The United Nations came into existence on October 24, 1945, when the UN Charter was officially ratified by the five permanent members and a majority of other signatories, with the cherished aim ‘to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war’.

Signed 75 years ago today, on June 26, 1945 at San Francisco, the United Nations Charter enshrines the most fundamental and comprehensive aspirations of humanity and the obligations of member-states to enable the flourishing of life and conduct of nations befitting the human of the species. The many organs that constitute the United Nations Organisation are mandated to fulfil the foundational aims of the world body in letter and in spirit.

In its chequered journey, the United Nations has come a long way. With all its imperfections, the United Nations remains the most important, truly international institution comprising some 193 sovereign, independent states from across the globe as its members. It symbolises the most fervent hope of humanity for peace, security, and a life of dignity and respect in an environment of inter-state, inter-regional, and inter-national relationship based on mutual tolerance, integrity, and goodwill.

Despite the threats to its basic goals that were unleashed almost from day one with the dropping of the atomic bomb on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, the blatant violations of membership obligations, challenges posed by human and environmental crises, cyber-security threats, and a host of other compelling issues that claim the attention of the United Nations at different points, it remains the most reassuring symbol of hope and sanity in the world today.

With all its imperfections, it is thanks to the sustained efforts of the United Nations that the world is this much safer, the human lot this much better, and the future still worth-working for. Often close to the brink, yet short of strike, a global conflagration of a Third World War has been avoided, humanitarian crises mitigated, and chances for peace enhanced. The UN is the first and the last point of reference for standards of good behaviour for governments and nations around the world.

Successive secretaries-general, heads of agencies, regional as well as country chiefs and functionaries at all levels, past and present, have each brought to bear their individual convictions and professional commitments on the discharge of their duties and advanced the goals of the United Nations and given it cause for legitimacy and worth often in the face of cynicism and threat.

Come 2021, it will be half a century of exemplary partnership between the Kingdom of Bhutan and the United Nations. Becoming the 128th member of the United Nations Organisation on September 21, 1971, thanks to the far-sighted vision of the Father of Modern Bhutan, Druk Gyalpo Jigme Dorji Wangchuck, has immensely benefitted the country, both in tangible as well as symbolical terms, advancing thereby the foundational ideals of United Nations to which Bhutan is fully committed and enhancing the overall development goals of the country through targeted, strategic support provided by the UN system.

Having started its operations in the country as early as 1973, the office of the United Nations Development Programme was formally established in 1979. Currently, it has some 26 agencies of the UN working in the country under the auspices of the Delivering as One approach with the Resident Coordinator as the overall chief.

Each head of the UN system in Bhutan and their colleagues have made their own unique contributions to the advancement of the country’s development goals particularly in the human resource capacity building and governance areas with significant, visible results in diverse sectors they have been involved in.

As a passionate believer in the noble ideals of the UN Charter, Bhutan has been playing its role, albeit modest, by participating actively in deliberations in the different bodies, advocating the foundational vision of the organisation, and in more recent years contributing volunteers to peace-building and peace-keeping missions in some of the most challenging hot-spots in the world.

Bhutan’s holistic development vision of Gross National Happiness, articulated by His Majesty Druk Gyalpo Jigme Singye Wangchuck, has found deep resonance with the long-term development goals of the UN. Endorsed as the ninth Millennium Development Goal, the UN General Assembly adopted pursuit of happiness as a basic human right and declared March 20th as the International Day of Happiness in 2012. Several themes of the 17-point Agenda 2030 draw their inspiration from the work of the high-level international experts’ team, including Nobel Laureates, appointed by His Majesty the King in 2012 to chart the post-2015 development road-map.

As the world celebrates the 75th anniversary of the signing of the United Nations Charter, it is a moment for some deep soul-searching, to reflect on the vision of the founding-fathers and the distance we have covered. How might the world look like without the United Nations? How might we make it more efficient, effective and fair? How do we hold the defaulters to account?

For Bhutan though, the benefits that have come through our membership to this pre-eminent extended family of nations have given to us a global platform to share the country’s unique vision of holistic development dedicated to human and societal flourishing within mutually supportive planetary boundaries. This membership has allowed us to make our own the all-embracing foundational ideals of the United Nations.

Inspired by Friendship in all Seasons, “working together to ensure no one is left behind is at the heart of our work in Bhutan and we are grateful for these partnerships”, in the words of the current UN Resident Coordinator, Mr Gerald Daly.

This is the inescapable fact. The ideals of the UN are human ideals, conceived and communicated in time for a time beyond time. The UN is us and ours. So are its ideals. They survive and thrive through individual faith and conviction. It is the integrity of individual leaders and individual nations and their citizens to breathe life into the UN and live out its noble ideals in their life and action. The soul of the UN expresses itself in the role of its functionaries and signatories.

For me as an individual, and a man of faith, the United Nations still represents the best of human yearning and the noblest of collective striving. If not for Covid-19, I should have been at Seville in Spain this moment to partake of the historic 75th anniversary of the signing of the UN Charter as a special invitee of Entreps-UN75.

May the sublime ideals of our United Nations flower and flourish in all realms, at all times, and in all lives…

__________________________________________________________________________________

Reflections:  June 26, 2020.

Thakur S Powdyel, Former Minister of Education, Royal Government of Bhutan

Entreps Global Juror.